Tag: NASL

How a third iteration of the New York Cosmos could work

Existing outside the constraints of a domestic league might be the way forward

(NY Cosmos)

Days after winning their third title in four years within the modern, second-division NASL, the New York Cosmos have purged their squad and staff as a familiar demise seems inevitable 31 years on from their first collapse. On the pitch, the second iteration of the Cosmos was a success, but they were once again undone by their outsized ambitions in a volatile league.

Despite playing their home matches at a modest university stadium and competing in one of two rival second-division leagues in the U.S., the Cosmos still managed to harken back to their original star power by signing the likes of Marcos Senna and Raul to participate in a competition that seemed lightyears away from La Liga.

The high point for the second generation Cosmos—from a standpoint of continuing the glitz and international profile that made their forebears the iconic club of American soccer, even today—arguably came in their very first match after being reformed, though. Before they joined the second attempt at an NASL.

That first match was Paul Scholes’ testimonial. Sir Alex Ferguson’s Manchester United v New York Cosmos at Old Trafford. With Eric Cantona as the Cosmos’ “director of soccer” and manager for the day, leading a squad filled with aging greats like Fabio Cannavaro, Dwight Yorke, Robbie Keane, Patrick Vieira, and Robert Pires.

(Sky Sports)

The Cosmos lost that match 6–0—after all, this was a group that had only met a few days earlier and they were playing against the reigning Premier League champions. Regardless of the result, the match and a Cosmos team filled with real-live Cosmos (plus Wayne Bridge) succeeded in sparking intrigue and excitement about the reborn club.

Obviously, to go from that to second-division matches at Hofstra University is a difficult trajectory. Flashy stadium proposals and attempts to claim a spot in MLS failed—league commissioner Don Garber rejected the idea of a third MLS New York team as recently as Friday—leaving the Cosmos in a dead-end position. Even if MLS did want them and the City of New York was willing to let them build a state of the art home of their own, that wouldn’t be the way for the Cosmos to be the Cosmos.

MLS’s constrictive rules and salary cap, as well as their “all for one” mentality, runs counter to the Cosmos’ big, bold, and individualistic image and a new stadium could be more of a burden than a necessity. So for the Cosmos to make a third go at existence, they might have to forge their own path. One outside the U.S. leagues that have always been too small for them.

Putting together a revolving squad of out of contract or recently retired superstars and playing friendlies and unofficial tournaments (like the International Champions Cup) around the world might be the first step towards finding a sustainable way forward for the Cosmos. They could play in premier venues and would be sure to draw big crowds, as preseason friendlies and star-fueled charity matches have been proven to do. They could be a sort of football version of the Harlem Globetrotters—global ambassadors for American soccer and an asset to the USSF—but without the buckets of confetti (side note: the Globetrotters have apparently “drafted” Leo Messi, Neymar, Tim Howard, and Landon Donovan in recent years…so the Cosmos would have to watch out for them, oddly enough).

If matches were scheduled to fill gaps in the TV schedule, broadcast rights would likely be desirable and the global nature of the endeavor could attract internet companies looking for live content to stream. And if there’s one thing the Cosmos proved upon reforming in 2010 its that they can sell merchandise.


With a focus more on entertainment and showmanship than trophies, the Globetrotters have succeeded for 90 years while playing utterly meaningless games from a results standpoint, so that shouldn’t be the primary concern for the Cosmos in this scenario. That said, in an age when top clubs almost seem held back in their own money-spinning globetrotting by their domestic campaigns as they actively search for ways to form new leagues beyond national or even continental boarders, the Cosmos could get a leg up on the global competition and prove their value as an addition to a potential/inevitable international super league of the future by taking on this form and creating new fans around the world.

Of course, if they did one day make the transition from touring team to a competitive club in an actual league, assembling a squad of younger players would be necessary. And the profits made as the former would ideally be used to fund the latter. In addition, being a part of a new global mega-league would almost certainly help them get a stadium built, which would then be necessary. While these might sound like futile plans for the day after never, these are the types of things a Cosmos 3.0 would have to map out—ways to be the masters of their own domain and limiting dependence on the success or approval of others—to avoid hitting yet another dead end.

Despite crumbling twice now, the idea of the New York Cosmos still has undeniable value and a credibility that few other American clubs, if any, have been able to achieve. It’s something that top players want to be associated with and multiple generations of fans have now supported. A third attempt at creating a viable model remains a worthwhile endeavor, but it will only be achieved through adaptation and evolution, and not regression or compromise. The Cosmos began as a pioneer club for America, now they have to look to being a pioneer club for the world.


https://upscri.be/16bb19

Deloitte report suggests promotion and relegation would be good for U.S. soccer

Well reasoned backing for a major overhaul of the U.S. system

(Ben Fast)

In a report that could vindicate the ardent, grassroots support for promotion and relegation in U.S. soccer that has often been met with eye rolls from the gatekeepers to the American game’s top levels, Deloitte has laid out the benefits and dangers of implementing promotion and relegation in the United States.

With long-standing questions about public interest and the financial health of American soccer leagues, the promotion and relegation system seen in many other parts of the world has been ignored in the U.S. in favor of closed leagues, as seen in more established and American-centric sports. New franchises in top-tier MLS are now paying eight to nine figure buy-in fees to gain entry to a single-entity format that guarantees first division play for as long as the league stays afloat. Naturally, fears over changing the terms to these agreements and suddenly adding a great deal of risk to investors has prevented promotion and relegation discussions from going beyond the realm of hypothetical fan theories. But this new report from accounting and professional services firm Deloitte—the company behind the annual Deloitte Football Money League—might change that.

In a press release, Dan Jones, Head of the Sport Business Group at Deloitte, says:

“U.S. soccer has a major opportunity to capitalize on the nation’s growing interest in soccer. We believe the introduction of promotion and relegation into the existing league system could have numerous long term benefits, including increased attendances, increased broadcast audiences, improved commercial revenue and a positive impact on both elite players and grassroots participants.

“The current closed system has served MLS well in its early years, but as it matures it is reaching member capacity, preventing further expansion. Other challenges facing the current structure include growing fan interest in overseas leagues such as the English Premier League and a stagnation in the number of players annually registered with U.S. Youth Soccer. The number of registered players has barely risen since 2000 despite vastly increased rates of participation in high schools.

“Though the U.S. soccer league system may not be ready for such a move immediately and its implementation may not appear urgent, the topic is worthy of greater exploration and debate. U.S. soccer should properly consider the merits of introduction of promotion and relegation and a transition plan for its successful introduction in order to drive U.S. soccer forward.”

Though promotion and relegation would present challenges—especially since it would have to be implemented into a pre-existing structure—Deloitte says that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. First, to address the biggest hurdle, they suggest instituting a phased introduction (playoffs to determine if a club goes down or remains) and parachute payments for relegated clubs, as the Premier League does, to mitigate risk for owners. Added regulations and minimum league standards would also be necessary, according to the report. The English Football Conference and Korea’s K-League are given as examples as once closed leagues that have successfully transitioned to a promotion and relegation format.

The stated benefits of promotion and relegation are far reaching. From increased fan interest and broadcast friendly storylines that, in turn, drive up commercial values, to an increase in owner motivation to succeed, improved player development (increased competition at all levels leading to more aggressive investment in coaching and training facilities), and infrastructure lending itself to natural growth.

(Deloitte Analysis of Promotion and Relegation in the USA)

A companion survey of more than 1,000 U.S. fans conducted by Deloitte demonstrates that there is an appetite for promotion and relegation in America. A whopping 88% of respondents said promotion and relegation would benefit the U.S. and 50% said they would be more likely to watch matches on TV if it were introduced. This increased interest would even extend beyond the club level to the U.S. national team, if this survey is to be believed (which could be a big “if”).

(Deloitte U.S. fan poll)

Another interesting potential benefit to promotion and relegation, according to Deloitte, is the possibility of reinvigorating the country’s stagnant youth player registration. Over the last 16 years, growth in this area has dropped off significantly and increasing competition would also increase demand for and investment in youth development.

(Deloitte)

The potential drawbacks, however, do not seem insurmountable. As previously mentioned, Deloitte recommends that promoted clubs would have to meet minimum organizational requirements to ensure competition, and player costs would likely skyrocket, as they have in Europe. What Deloitte repeatedly stresses, though, is that despite all the theoretical benefits, U.S. soccer might not be mature enough to handle such a transition just yet, especially with the question of fairness to those who have already invested to wide-ranging degrees.

(Deloitte Analysis of Promotion and Relegation in the USA)

And that’s been the primary reason behind American soccer’s most powerful shutting down the conversation in the past.

“We play in a country where the major leagues are really successful,” said MLS commissioner Don Garber at the Soccerex convention in 2015. “There is no promotion and relegation in hockey and basketball and they work really well. It is not happening in MLS any time soon.”

“We have a structure that intrigues the rest of the world, the idea that owners can come together and be partners off the field and try and beat the heck out of each other on the field has worked really well in the U.S. in other sports to make some of the most valuable leagues in the world. It is attractive, it allows for some ability to plan and invest over a long period of time.

“How does America benefit? Massive investment in bricks and a league that will be around in 100 years from now. It has become more of a seller’s market. There is more interest in investing in MLS than there are teams available.”

USSF president Sunil Gulati has also said that implementing such a system would be “frought with peril” and would require “very long discussions with many people with high LSAT scores [i.e. lawyers].”

At this point, it should be noted that Deloitte’s report was commissioned by Silva International Investments Ltd.—a company founded by Riccardo Silva, president and co-owner of one-year-old Miami FC in the second-division NASL. Surely these findings will be music to his ears, even though they present a less than iron-clad case, especially as the NASL’s future is once again looking less than certain.

https://whatahowler.com/tampa-bay-ottawa-voluntarily-relegate-themselves-from-league-without-relegation-d6e47ef9da00

Even with this report to fortify the argument in favor of promotion and relegation in the U.S., nothing short of a movement amongst MLS owners—the people with the most money on the line—is likely to bring about change on this front. And that would require a level of financial bravery that they seem both unlikely and unable to possess.

The full report summary can be viewed here: [MidfieldPress]


https://upscri.be/16bb19

Brazilian Ronaldo says he’ll try to make comeback as a player for his NASL club

(@ENH_Fotografia)
(@ENH_Fotografia)

Ronaldo — the Brazilian one who won the Ballon d’Or in 1997 and 2002 and not the Portuguese one who won it in 2008, 2013 and 2014 — was unveiled as a minority owner of the NASL’s Fort Lauderdale Strikers at a press conference on Wednesday. And to ensure his new investment in the U.S. second division gets that added bit of publicity, he said that he’s going to try and play for the club at some point.

Read more